A student loan program had problems. Senators are calling for change : NPR

A student loan program had problems. Senators are calling for change : NPR

Sen. Sherrod Brown of Ohio is one particular of 3 lawmakers contacting for adjustments soon after an NPR investigation discovered mismanagement of cash flow-pushed reimbursement (IDR) ideas for scholar financial loans.

Kevin Dietsch/Getty Photographs


hide caption

toggle caption

Kevin Dietsch/Getty Photos


Sen. Sherrod Brown of Ohio is 1 of a few lawmakers calling for modifications immediately after an NPR investigation identified mismanagement of income-driven reimbursement (IDR) plans for scholar loans.

Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images

Lawmakers have called for an investigation into a troubled scholar financial loan cancellation plan two weeks immediately after an NPR report exposed the system — intended to assistance reduced-cash flow borrowers, and sooner or later offer them financial debt cancellation — wasn’t living up to its guarantee.

A lot more than 9 million debtors are at present enrolled in profits-pushed reimbursement (IDR) designs, which are intended to enable folks who can’t pay for to make large regular monthly payments. The programs guarantee bank loan cancellation soon after 20-25 several years. But files acquired by NPR offer you placing proof that these options have been terribly mismanaged by financial loan servicers and the U.S. Department of Training.

The files lose new light-weight on the 2021 revelation that, at the time, 4.4 million debtors experienced been repaying for at minimum 20 many years but only 32 experienced experienced loans canceled less than IDR.

“A modern NPR investigative report uncovered the IDR system is riddled with problems and mismanagement, even even worse than the community earlier comprehended, resulting in hundreds of thousands of borrowers becoming not able to get hold of financial debt cancellation,” a group of Democratic lawmakers wrote in a letter sent Thursday to Customer Monetary Defense Bureau (CFPB) Director Rohit Chopra.

Sen. Sherrod Brown of Ohio, Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois signed on to the letter, which phone calls for CFPB to “investigate these studies and use all of its authorities to make certain debtors are accessing IDR plan gains and acquire the pupil financial loan forgiveness they have earned.”

The senators also sent a letter Thursday to U.S. Schooling Secretary Miguel Cardona, calling for his company to acquire motion.

“We urge the Division of Education and learning (‘ED’) to employ an IDR waiver, very similar to the ongoing waiver for the General public Provider Personal loan Forgiveness (‘PSLF’) application, to make it possible for debtors to accessibility the personal loan forgiveness they ended up promised through IDR,” the letter says.

These senators aren’t by itself in their aid of an IDR waiver. Before this yr, more than 100 distinct advocacy teams cosigned a letter to Cardona demanding a waiver that would retroactively loosen the program’s procedures.

The troubles NPR discovered with IDR

Under IDR, a regular payment of $ for a borrower earning a lot less than 150{ac23b82de22bd478cde2a3afa9e55fd5f696f5668b46466ac4c8be2ee1b69550} of the federal poverty line should really nevertheless count towards bank loan cancellation. But NPR attained a previously unreleased 2016 overview of servicers, performed by the Training Department’s business of Federal University student Help, in which officials warned these $ IDR payments “are not sufficiently tracked.”

Nearly 50 {ac23b82de22bd478cde2a3afa9e55fd5f696f5668b46466ac4c8be2ee1b69550} of all IDR debtors are making $ every month payments, in accordance to a 2019 analysis by the Center for American Progress (CAP). Not tracking these payments could delay or derail hundreds of thousands of the least expensive-earnings borrowers on their way to loan cancellation.

The paperwork NPR attained also exposed other irregularities in how servicers count IDR payments.

For example, if a month-to-month payment of $100.01 is owed but a borrower pays just $100 — 1 penny shy of the necessary amount of money — three mortgage servicers stated they would nonetheless rely it as a qualifying payment. But 4 others indicated they would not.

In response to NPR’s initial investigation, the Division of Schooling stated, “Borrowers spot their believe in in us to make absolutely sure these programs do the job the way they ended up meant to, and we intend to honor that belief. We are informed of historical difficulties with prior procedures that experienced undermined correct monitoring of suitable payments. The recent problem is unacceptable and we are fully commited to addressing these troubles.”

What is future for IDR

Implementing an IDR waiver could enable set qualifying debtors again on the path to loan cancellation. But not absolutely everyone thinks the treatment must tumble exclusively to the Division of Schooling.

Beth Akers, who experiments student loans at the conservative-leaning American Business Institute (AEI), explained to NPR she supports the idea of IDR – but she blames lawmakers for generating these kinds of a tricky suite of programs to implement.

“We’re not likely to get these courses cleaned up devoid of legislation,” Akers mentioned. “The servicers have a thankless task. So does the Department of Training, due to the fact they ended up handed a pile of rubbish.”

NPR achieved out to the CFPB and the Education Office for comment on the letters, and will update this tale with their responses.

NPR is fully commited to reporting on urgent challenges that issue to you, like student loans. Indication up for our Instruction e-newsletter to keep up to date. You can assist NPR’s dependable, very important protection by donating to your nearby NPR station today.

The student loan pause has been extended through Aug. 31 : NPR

The student loan pause has been extended through Aug. 31 : NPR

U.S. Education Secretary Miguel Cardona delivers remarks in Washington, D.C., in January. The department has extended the freeze on federal student loan payments several times since the pandemic began in March 2020.

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images


U.S. Education Secretary Miguel Cardona delivers remarks in Washington, D.C., in January. The department has extended the freeze on federal student loan payments several times since the pandemic began in March 2020.

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

The Biden administration announced Wednesday that it is again extending the moratorium on federal student loan payments, interest and collections, this time until summer’s end, Aug. 31. The U.S. Department of Education also unveiled a plan to reset the roughly 7 million borrowers who are in default, using the pandemic pause to restore their accounts to good standing.

“We are still recovering from the pandemic and the unprecedented economic disruption it caused,” said President Biden in a statement announcing the extension. “If loan payments were to resume on schedule in May, analysis of recent data from the Federal Reserve suggests that millions of student loan borrowers would face significant economic hardship, and delinquencies and defaults could threaten Americans’ financial stability.”

The loan repayment freeze began in March 2020, at the beginning of the pandemic, and will now last at least two and a half years – an unprecedented respite in the financial lives of tens of millions of borrowers. According to the latest department data, 500,000 federal student loan borrowers – out of more than 43 million – have been repaying their loans during the pause.

This is the seventh time the moratorium has been extended by the Trump and Biden administrations, according to the Education Department’s Office of Federal Student Aid. The latest extension comes after reports of a department email to loan servicers telling them not to communicate with borrowers about the previous repayment deadline, May 1.

In an interview that aired on NPR’s All Things Considered Wednesday, Education Secretary Miguel Cardona spoke about the Biden Administration’s announcement.

“We know so many of our borrowers have fallen on hard times, even before the pandemic. They maybe had delinquent payments or they’d have to default on their loans. And what we want to do is make sure they have a fresh start. We want to make sure that their loans are put in good standing again,” Cardono told NPR.

The extension, while expected, comes with at least one surprise: It’s shorter than many Democrats had hoped for.

Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.), chair of the Senate’s education committee, tweeted earlier this week that the payment pause “has got to be extended until at least 2023. With rising costs and still building back from the pandemic, this is not the time to make borrowers start paying again.”

News of the extension through August also drew a tepid response from borrower advocates.

“The Biden Administration should absolutely extend the payment pause,” Abby Shafroth of the National Consumer Law Center said in a statement.But the pause is a temporary measure that should be in service of a longer-term fix, or borrowers may be back in the same crunch four months from now.”

This shorter extension also puts Biden in the precarious political position of asking millions of voters to resume loan payments on the eve of November’s midterm elections – unless he does what many experts expect him to do and simply issues another extension over the summer.

“The @WhiteHouse should just be honest about what they’re doing and announce they’ll turn the loan portfolio on after Election Day,” tweeted Trump’s former education secretary, Betsy DeVos.

The extension is deeply unpopular with Biden’s Republican critics, who have pointed out that the pause on interest and payments has cost the federal government at least $95 billion.

In March, when NPR reported this extension was likely, the top Republican on the House education committee, Rep. Virginia Foxx of North Carolina, responded: “Another repayment freeze only begets unfairness that is inevitably leveled at both taxpayers and responsible borrowers alike.”

Borrowers in default are getting a fresh start

Perhaps the biggest news of today’s announcement wasn’t the extension itself, which was the worst-kept secret in Washington for weeks, but this vague line from the Education Department’s press release:

“The Department will continue to assess the financial impacts of the pandemic on student loan borrowers and to prepare to transition borrowers smoothly back into repayment. This includes allowing all borrowers with paused loans to receive a ‘fresh start’ on repayment by eliminating the impact of delinquency and default and allowing them to reenter repayment in good standing.”

This is big news for the roughly 7 million borrowers whose federal student loans are currently in default, many of whom had wages garnished and Social Security benefits withheld before the pandemic. When the pause eventually ends, those collections will not resume and these borrowers will be restored to good standing.

Normally, to exit default, the Education Department requires that borrowers coordinate with a default-focused loan servicing company and make nine “reasonable and affordable monthly payments… within 20 days of the due date” – and make them over the course of 10 consecutive months. With this restart, however, the Biden administration is using its pandemic authority and the ongoing repayment pause to waive this rehabilitation process.

“During the pause, we will continue our preparations to give borrowers a fresh start and to ensure that all borrowers have access to repayment plans that meet their financial situations and needs,” Education Secretary Miguel Cardona said in a statement.

It is unclear if borrowers will also have their access to federal student aid restored, meaning they can potentially take out new student loans – something borrowers in default cannot do. Nearly half of all defaulters have never finished college, and losing access to federal financial aid can make it especially challenging to go back and finish a degree.

“For too long, defaulted borrowers have slipped through the cracks and been made to suffer at the hands of the Department of Education’s punitive collection system,” said Persis Yu of the Student Borrower Protection Center in a statement. “We applaud the Biden Administration’s decision to pull millions of borrowers out of default and to give them a fresh start.”

Getting the word out to defaulted borrowers won’t be easy

The most difficult part of the department’s fresh start for borrowers in default will be finding them. According to a January report from the Government Accountability Office (GAO), “the contractor managing borrowers’ defaulted loans initially did not have valid email addresses for about half of the borrowers in default.”

The GAO reported that the Education Department was able to provide some of the missing contacts but that addresses are still missing for about 1 in 4 defaulted borrowers.

According to the report, “Education is planning to reach these borrowers by using other outreach channels to share messages about rehabilitation options,” including through social media.

No mention of student loan cancellation

News of this latest extension received mixed reviews from borrower advocates not only because it’s shorter than many expected but because Biden continued his silence on the possibility of broader student loan cancellation.

On the campaign trail, Biden pledged to cancel at least $10,000 per borrower. The longer he waits to fulfill that pledge – or clearly abandon it – the more pressure he takes from fellow Democrats.

“I think some folks read these extensions as savvy politics,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez tweeted on Tuesday, “but I don’t think those folks understand the panic and disorder it causes people to get so close to these deadlines just to extend the uncertainty. It doesn’t have the affect people think it does. We should cancel them.”

Even Yu, who supports the move to help defaulted borrowers, says “the Department must not squander this opportunity to fix the broken student loan system. Under this new swift deadline, the Department must work fast to end its punitive collection practices, ensure meaningful pathways for borrowers to get out of debt, and provide widespread debt cancellation.”

It is possible the Biden administration is still exploring options to cancel some level of student debt. It’s also possible the administration has no plans for debt cancellation but is reluctant to make that clear ahead of the hotly contested midterms.

The clearest, most recent indication of Biden’s intentions came last month when White House Chief of Staff Ron Klain said, “The president is going to look at what we should do on student debt before the pause expires, or he’ll extend the pause.”

And extend the pause, he did.

Elissa Nadworny contributed to this report.

Your ex’s student loans could still be yours after a divorce : NPR

Angela Powell, a business analyst in Texas, has been trying to untangle a joint consolidation loan from her ex-husband since their divorce in 2014. Powell’s ex-husband stopped regularly paying on the loan years ago.

Katie Hayes Luke for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Katie Hayes Luke for NPR


Angela Powell, a business analyst in Texas, has been trying to untangle a joint consolidation loan from her ex-husband since their divorce in 2014. Powell’s ex-husband stopped regularly paying on the loan years ago.

Katie Hayes Luke for NPR

Angela Powell met her “prince” during her freshman year of college. She had dreams of a happy marriage, a successful career and a couple of great kids. After graduation, she got married and started on the other two, attending business school while her husband got his law degree, before the two settled down to start a family in Arizona.

Around that time, they decided to consolidate their loans under a new Department of Education program for married couples. The perks were high — a lower interest rate for their debt and only one payment to worry about per month.

“I didn’t think it was a big deal because we’re going to pay all this off. We’re going to be married forever, right?” Powell said. “Fast-forward to the housing market crisis in 2009/2010. Not a happy marriage anymore. Everybody loses their jobs.”

After the divorce, Powell’s relationship with her ex soured. Documents reviewed by NPR show he has not made regular payments to the loan since 2016. That’s despite the fact he’d originally taken out almost double her debt. Through consolidation, they are now on the hook together for nearly $200,000 — more than five times the amount of Powell’s initial loan.

“I’m stuck with having this thing on my back,” says Powell, “and knowing that at the end of the day, if he chooses not to pay, guess what? My monthly payment is $1,942.50.”

More than 14,000 borrowers participated in the short-lived program, which Congress shuttered in 2006. It seemed like a simple concept: Joint consolidation loans allowed for couples to have one single monthly payment with a lower interest rate. The problem came when trying to separate loans in the case of divorce or domestic violence. The program has no way to disentangle the debts.

“It seems pretty straightforward. If you can put something together, you can take it apart,” says Patrick Stebly. He has been in this situation since his divorce in 2013 and has spent the last five years trying to change it for everyone else.

Stebly’s advocacy has inspired legislation to remedy this problem. Introduced by Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., and Rep. David E. Price, D-N.C., the bill would allow, in cases of divorce or domestic violence, for joint loans to be split proportionately based on the original loan amounts. Nearly half a dozen families in this situation told NPR this is the fix they need.

Holly Rodriguez found herself responsible for both her and her ex-husband’s student loans.

Parker Michels-Boyce for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Parker Michels-Boyce for NPR


Holly Rodriguez found herself responsible for both her and her ex-husband’s student loans.

Parker Michels-Boyce for NPR

Warner first introduced the bill in 2017 after a constituent reached out about paying her abusive ex-husband’s student loans. She had moved from Florida to Virginia to get away from him.

“While she physically got away, she couldn’t get away from this mutual debt … from an abusive husband. That’s just wrong,” said Warner.

Once the bill was introduced, people from across the U.S. contacted the senator’s office asking for relief from the consolidation program.

There is no data on how many of the initial borrowers have since separated, but national and state domestic violence relief organizations say economic sabotage— like tanking a spouse’s credit — is one of the top tactics used in abusive relationships.

“It’s so powerful that many survivors cite their ability to provide financially for themselves and their children as one of the top reasons that they stay in an abusive relationship,” says Monica McLaughlin of the National Network to End Domestic Violence.

NPR spoke to borrowers who had experienced physical and mental abuse from former partners who now refuse to pay their student loans; they say Warner’s legislation would set them free.

“There are so many barriers that survivors face,” said McLaughlin. “Let’s knock this one down and look to the next one.”

Stebly and his ex-wife count themselves among the lucky ones. They have an amicable relationship, so after they separated, they put together a court agreement to repay their loans: His ex-wife pays her portion of the loan to him, and then he pays the loan provider. It’s a workaround, but it has some drawbacks. His ex-wife should be eligible for Public Service Loan Forgiveness, but she cannot claim it to erase her debt because their loans are consolidated.

Officials have told Stebly over and over again: It would only take less than 1,000 words to fix this problem and separate their loans — but those words have to be approved by Congress.

“I’ve been banging out a thousand-word emails trying to talk about this thing, you know, daily for a while, trying to get somebody excited about this,” Stebly said. “To me, it seems very straightforward.”

Holly Rodriguez hugs her youngest son, Iommi, at her home in Richmond, Va.

Parker Michels-Boyce for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Parker Michels-Boyce for NPR


Holly Rodriguez hugs her youngest son, Iommi, at her home in Richmond, Va.

Parker Michels-Boyce for NPR

Holly Rodriguez agrees. She’s a single mother of two in Richmond, Va., and is reckoning with her decisions from two decades ago. She’s getting a divorce, she’s in default on her student loans — and the two issues are more related than it may seem.

Rodriguez’s loan now amounts to almost $72,000. The jump comes from consolidating with her husband’s loan, interest and about 10 years of tenuous finances.

“We did pay initially,” Rodriguez said. “And then my husband, soon after my daughter was born, lost his job. That put our finances in a very hard place.”

Rodriguez works in fundraising and communications for nonprofits; her ex-husband works in the restaurant industry as a line cook and a dishwasher. Both went through periods of unemployment and faced medical setbacks over the course of their marriage.

Finances were “a very contentious element of our marriage when we were together,” she says, and their separation wasn’t amicable. In 2018, she filed for, and was granted, a protective order for her and her children. It was later dismissed.

Given all that, getting her ex to pay up on student loans wasn’t a top priority — but the collection agency kept calling. So Rodriguez contacted her loan servicer to let it know about her situation. She provided her husband’s contact information and proved he was employed, but it did not matter.

The loan was in her name, and the loan servicer said if she wanted him to pay, she would have to work it out with him.

Rodriguez says her husband stopped regular payments on their student loans years ago. After repeated requests from NPR, he did not respond for comment.

“I was told, ‘Yes, he co-signed with you, but you signed the paperwork first, so we pursued you first,’ ” Rodriguez said.

Afraid any missed payments would directly impact Rodriguez’s credit score, she took on the entirety of the debt.

“The thing is, I don’t mind paying my student loans back, but I do have a problem with having to pay for my loans and his loans,” Rodriguez said. “I’ve been paying debt that isn’t mine, and that’s not OK. There’s nothing that makes sense about that.”

For two years, joint consolidation borrowers could benefit from the pause on federal student loan payments, but that will change in just a few months: Payments start back up on May 1. President Biden has made his aversion to widespread debt forgiveness clear.

Advocates and lawmakers acknowledge that a legislative fix should be an easy fix to make. “Even when things are totally logical and rational, stuff takes longer than it should in Congress,” Warner says.

Getting the legislation through the gears of Congress — the same Congress that failed to pass Biden’s social spending package and recent voting rights legislation — may prove challenging.

The best business and finance tips for creatives : Life Kit : NPR

Illustration showing a hand drawn pyramid, broken up into blocks internally. Each block is filled with different financial tips including weekly time spent on finances, automatic saving, and investing, that can help people reach "financial awesomeness."
Illustration showing a hand drawn pyramid, broken up into blocks internally. Each block is filled with different financial tips including weekly time spent on finances, automatic saving, and investing, that can help people reach "financial awesomeness."

Not every hobby needs to be a side hustle. But, if you set out to make money off of yours – congratulations, you’re running a business! Now you have to pay attention to finances.

It can be uncomfortable taking something you do for fun and turning it into a product with a dollar value, especially if you’re a creative person. Add on the trope that being financially savvy is antithetical with being a true artist, and it’s no wonder many creatives feel “bad with money.”

But when you ignore your finances, you’re not only missing out on peace of mind, you’re also losing the ability to make sound business decisions that come from a place of clarity rather than an emotional “I’ll take what I can get” energy.

Writer, illustrator and musician Paco de Leon runs a financial education firm and bookkeeping agency. Her book, Finance for the People, is a beginner-friendly guide to navigating your financial life. De Leon joined Life Kit to offer her best money management tips for creatives.

Paco de Leon is a musician, author, illustrator, founder of The Hell Yeah Group and author of Finance for the People.

Left: Penguin Life; Right: Photograph by Jean Pablo


hide caption

toggle caption

Left: Penguin Life; Right: Photograph by Jean Pablo

Set up weekly finance time

Whether you’re following up on invoices, logging expenses, paying bills or researching accountants, many financial chores are forgotten if we don’t take time to prioritize them. To avoid this, set up a weekly finance meeting with yourself and treat it as sacred. Spend anywhere from 20 minutes to an hour to check things off your list, instead of only doing them when you remember.

“Don’t allow people to book meetings or bother you during that time,” says de Leon. “Having that space to focus will allow that part of your life to expand.”

tk

Separate your personal and professional finances

It’s easy to neglect your finances if all your money is kept in the same account and your transactions aren’t marked as personal or professional.

So, bank with your business in mind. Monitor your money and how it’s being used by creating separate checking and savings accounts for your personal and professional finances. Budgeting for your business becomes a lot easier when you have a clear idea of what you’re actually spending and earning.

At first, it might feel a little scary if there’s no money flowing in. But, de Leon says, it can also feel good to look at your stagnant accounts and ask, “How am I going to water this? How is this going to get fed?”

Don’t forget taxes

Another reason for separating your professional and personal finances is it makes it easier for you to report your earnings to the IRS, which you’re required to do, regardless of the amount you make.

And, if you make more than $400 a year, you’ll likely have to pay both income tax and self-employment tax. To prepare for this, de Leon says to save anywhere from 10 to 30 percent of the money you earn and put it in your business savings account to prepare for tax season.

If preparing for taxes is scary or stressful, consider hiring an accountant! The U.S. tax code is thousands of pages long and it changes often. Hiring someone to help you navigate it can provide “a huge return on your investment in terms of how much it costs,” says de Leon.

Know your market

Here’s a hard truth: Just because you enjoy making photographs and your friends like them on Instagram doesn’t mean your next step should be buying a domain name, producing hundreds of prints and setting up an online shop.

To better understand if there’s demand for what you offer, de Leon recommends asking yourself, “Whose problem am I solving?” Who is looking for what I do or make, and why?

From an artistic perspective, it might feel strange to frame your work as a solution to a problem, says de Leon. But if you’ve decided to put your work in a commercial space, that question helps you consider who you are trying to reach, who is willing to buy your work and what they are willing to spend.

To demystify pricing, consider concrete and abstract costs

Pricing your products or setting your rates is like a “cactus bush,” says de Leon. “It’s prickly and hard to navigate.”

Pricing requires you to consider concrete factors, like the cost of your materials and workspace, and abstract ones, like the value of your time, your level of experience, who you want to reach and what you offer that no one else can.

If examining all of that sounds overwhelming, remember that pricing falls within a range. There’s a low and high end for every service and product on the market. Ask your peers or research online to get a sense of what those limits are and afterward, reflect on where you want to be in that range and why.

It can feel simpler for beginners to add up all of the above and decide on an hourly rate. But, depending on what you’re offering and the more experience you gain, setting a price based on overall value – the need you’re filling or solution you’re providing for someone – is ultimately better for creators, says de Leon.

Know when to ask for help or raise your prices

If you are earning revenue from a skill or product, you might be doing a bunch of other things, too: sourcing, marketing, shipping, bookkeeping.

Pay attention to the tasks that feel difficult. What slows you down, burns you out, or takes up time that you’d rather spend doing something else? It may be helpful to outsource this task.

And, if your time becomes more valuable…well, it just might be time to raise your prices and see what happens.

The podcast portion of this story was produced by Sylvie Douglis.

We’d love to hear from you. If you have a good life hack, leave us a voicemail at 202-216-9823 or email us at LifeKit@npr.org. Your tip could appear in an upcoming episode.

If you love Life Kit and want more, subscribe to our newsletter.

Consumer groups want the FDIC to ban rent-a-bank loans with rates that can top 100{ac23b82de22bd478cde2a3afa9e55fd5f696f5668b46466ac4c8be2ee1b69550} : NPR

With the Trump-era head of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. stepping down, consumer protection groups see an opportunity to put an end to “rent-a-bank” loans with sky-high interest rates.

Graeme Sloan/Sipa USA via Reuters


hide caption

toggle caption

Graeme Sloan/Sipa USA via Reuters


With the Trump-era head of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. stepping down, consumer protection groups see an opportunity to put an end to “rent-a-bank” loans with sky-high interest rates.

Graeme Sloan/Sipa USA via Reuters

In 2019, Sarah Ahmed needed about $2,000. She had just moved from Iowa to Tampa, Florida. And she was renting a new apartment and getting her young son set up in an after-school program.

“So I was just kind of running a little close to the red,” Ahmed says, “between moving, finishing furnishing my place and getting it ready for my son.”

Ahmed says she tried getting a loan from a regular bank, but with her student loan debt, she couldn’t qualify. So she started looking around online. She found a lender called Personify Financial willing to give her a two-year, $2,300 loan. She says she sent in her pay stubs and financial information. Then the company told her what the annual interest rate would be.

“It was like 98{ac23b82de22bd478cde2a3afa9e55fd5f696f5668b46466ac4c8be2ee1b69550},” she says.

Sarah Ahmed and her 9-year-old son, Alex, at their apartment in Tampa, Florida. Ahmed got stuck paying more than $2,000 in interest on a $2,300 loan from an online lender. Consumer groups want the FDIC to stop these “rent-a-bank” loans.

Courtesy of Sarah Ahmed


hide caption

toggle caption

Courtesy of Sarah Ahmed

Ahmed says she was nervous about accepting such a high rate. But she was feeling kind of desperate.

Typically, interest rates that high are illegal in most states, including Florida, where Ahmed lives.

“Florida limits interest rates to about 31{ac23b82de22bd478cde2a3afa9e55fd5f696f5668b46466ac4c8be2ee1b69550} on a $2,000 loan,” says Lauren Saunders, an attorney with the National Consumer Law Center.

Saunders says, though, that some online lenders have figured out a way to evade those state laws. And they’re charging people like Ahmed 100{ac23b82de22bd478cde2a3afa9e55fd5f696f5668b46466ac4c8be2ee1b69550} or even 200{ac23b82de22bd478cde2a3afa9e55fd5f696f5668b46466ac4c8be2ee1b69550} interest.

“We call this a rent-a-bank scheme,” says Saunders.

It’s called that because online lenders like Personify Financial are not banks. And normally, they’d be bound by state interest rate caps. But Saunders says the companies get around those caps by partnering with small banks most people have never heard of.

“Banks are exempt from most state interest rate laws,” Saunders says. “So predatory lenders have found that they can find a rogue bank, launder their loan through the bank, call it a ‘bank loan’ and claim that it’s not subject to the state interest rate limit.”

The vast majority of banks do not gouge people with sky-high interest rates on loans. But Saunders’ nonprofit has identified a handful that are in these rent-a-bank schemes with more than a dozen online lenders. Her rough estimate is together they’ve loaned more than $1 billion in recent years.

Saunders’ organization and more than a dozen consumer protection groups are calling on the government to step in and ban these rent-a-bank schemes. She’s hopeful because a change of regime is underway at the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., an agency that she says, among other things, “has the authority to stop risky practices that impact the safety and soundness of the bank.”

On Friday, Jelena McWilliams, a Trump appointee, stepped down as chairman of the FDIC. Her successor will be nominated by President Biden. “With the change of leadership at the FDIC,” Saunders says, “it’s time for the FDIC to stop its banks from fronting for predatory lenders.”

In Ahmed’s case, her loan, with its 97.1{ac23b82de22bd478cde2a3afa9e55fd5f696f5668b46466ac4c8be2ee1b69550} interest rate, didn’t actually come from Personify Financial, the lender she found online. It was issued by a bank based in Utah called First Electronic Bank.

“Very little was going towards the principal balance,” Ahmed says. “Most of it was going towards the interest. … I was working my butt off, and it was like I wasn’t making any progress.”

A year after borrowing $2,300, her loan documents show she’d paid $1,930 just in interest and still owed $1,548 on the principal.

Saunders says First Electronic Bank has just one physical bank branch, but it makes these high-interest loans across much of the U.S. through this rent-a-bank scheme.

“It does normal things out of the branch, but it also has this side business of laundering loans for predatory lenders,” Saunders says.

First Electronic Bank declined an interview. It said in a statement that it complies with the law and that it gives people access to loans “whether they have great credit or are excluded from the banking system due to a lack of credit history or past credit challenges.”

Personify Financial also declined an interview but said in a statement that it helps smaller banks make more credit available to borrowers.

For her part, Ahmed worried that she was going to have to keep paying thousands of dollars more in interest on that loan.

“It was like I asked for help to dig out of this hole and just created a deeper hole for me to inhabit,” she says. “I felt stuck.”

But eventually she got unstuck. Ahmed paid the loan back with help from a nonprofit called Capital Good Fund that gave her an affordable loan with a much lower interest rate. So now, she can spend more of her paycheck on her son. She recently enrolled him in soccer and bought him cleats and a uniform.

President Biden hasn’t yet kept his student loan forgiveness promise : NPR

President Biden walks to Marine One outside the White House on Dec. 2.

Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images


President Biden walks to Marine One outside the White House on Dec. 2.

Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

When President-elect Joe Biden was asked whether student loan cancellation figured into his economic recovery plan, he declared, “It should be done immediately.”

“[Student debt is] holding people up,” Biden said on Nov. 16, 2020. “They’re in real trouble. They’re having to make choices between paying their student loan and paying the rent.”

On the campaign trail, Biden had pledged to cancel at least $10,000 of student debt per person.

One year later, while Biden has provided hundreds of thousands of borrowers with debt relief, that $10,000 promise remains unfulfilled. Here’s a look at why — and what he has done.

Biden has focused on preexisting forgiveness programs

The Biden administration’s approach to student loan relief began with improving, extending or expanding a handful of programs that were already on the books.

“We’re working really hard to get students the relief that they’re entitled to” through these preexisting programs, Undersecretary of Education James Kvaal told NPR on Friday.

While it’s not loan forgiveness, Biden extended the pandemic pause on federal student loan payments; that pause is now slated to lift in February. His other actions essentially keep promises the U.S. government had already made to borrowers — rather than make new ones. For example:

  • Total and permanent disability discharge: In August, Education Secretary Miguel Cardona announced that the department would erase the federal student debts of thousands of borrowers with permanent disabilities. A 2019 NPR investigation found that, even though eligible borrowers have been legally entitled to a full discharge of their loans, the process was so complicated that fewer than half were able to shed their debts. The latest data from the Education Department suggests that these changes will help at least 370,000 borrowers drop more than $6.5 billion in student debts.
  • Borrower defense and closed-school discharge: The Biden administration has dramatically expanded efforts to help students who have been defrauded by for-profit colleges and/or whose schools have been forced to close. Defrauded students who previously filed “borrower defense” claims but were given only partial relief under Trump administration rules will now see the rest of their federal student loans discharged.
  • Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF): The program meant to forgive borrowers’ debts after 10 years of public service and steady loan payments has been notoriously stingy, with complex rules and serial mismanagement pushing out many eligible borrowers. In October, though, the department used its expanded pandemic authority to retroactively loosen those rules and give borrowers credit for disqualified loan payments. According to the department, the overhaul has already forgiven $2 billion in debts.

Through these efforts, the Education Department says it has discharged or is in the process of discharging roughly $12.7 billion in student debt, affecting more than 638,000 borrowers.

While these moves were cheered by borrowers and advocates, they were not without controversy. The top Republican on the House Education Committee, Rep. Virginia Foxx of North Carolina, decried the department’s PSLF waiver, calling it “an abuse of executive authority” and “too significant of an issue” to act without Congress.

Broader loan forgiveness would be even more controversial.

In February, Sen. John Thune, R-S.D., responded to some Democrats’ demand that Biden forgive as much as $50,000 in student debt per borrower by calling it “incredibly, fundamentally unfair” to students who have already repaid their debts.

Foxx agrees, telling NPR that borrowers have a responsibility to repay their student debts: “It’s no different than having taken out a loan for a car that you then find you can’t pay back or taking out a loan for a home that you can no longer pay for — or you choose not to pay for.”

Many critics of broad loan forgiveness agree that the cost of college is out of control but insist that canceling student debts would simply address a symptom of the problem, not its cause.

“In fact, Democrats’ ‘solution’ is likely to make things worse,” Thune said on the Senate floor.

“What incentive will colleges have to restrain tuition growth if they think they can rely on the federal government to subsidize their students’ tuition fees through loan forgiveness?”

Advocates and borrowers aren’t satisfied with Biden’s actions so far

While many Republicans have resisted calls for debt cancellation, many Democrats and advocates for student loan relief are growing restless. To them, Biden’s $12.7 billion in debt relief so far is a rounding error, considering that nearly 46 million Americans have $1.6 trillion in federal student loans. And he campaigned on doing more — again, $10,000 per borrower.

“That was a pretty clear promise that he made during the campaign,” says Persis Yu, policy director at the Student Borrower Protection Center. “And certainly, that is a promise that I think many borrowers are right now waiting for him to fulfill.”

Yu also says keeping that promise would make a huge difference, especially for borrowers already in default. “Roughly 16 million borrowers would have their entire debts extinguished, and that amounts to roughly two-thirds of the borrowers who are in default.”

“Crumbs’ worth of action.” That’s how Jalil Mustaffa Bishop describes the Biden administration’s efforts thus far. The assistant professor at Villanova University studies inequities in higher education.

In June, borrower advocates erected signs in front of the White House calling on President Biden to cancel student debt.

Paul Morigi/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Paul Morigi/Getty Images

Mustaffa Bishop says the student loan system badly needs an overhaul, especially “for groups that historically have been marginalized and had to experience generations of different types of debt traps,” from sharecropping to subprime mortgages to payday lending. Student loans are no different.

Mustaffa Bishop co-authored a recent survey of nearly 1,300 Black borrowers. The report, “Jim Crow Debt,” produced in partnership with the Education Trust, unpacks how pervasive racial inequities, including widespread wealth disparities and persistent workplace discrimination, have left many people of color drowning in student debt.

A 2019 report from the Institute on Assets and Social Policy at Brandeis University found that “Twenty years after starting college, the median debt of White borrowing students has been reduced by 94 percent — with almost half holding no student debt — whereas Black borrowers at the median still owe 95 percent of their cumulative borrowing total.”

Two-thirds of respondents to Mustaffa Bishop’s survey said, in hindsight, they regretted having taken out student loans.

“The student debt crisis is a racial and economic justice issue and we must finally begin to address it as such,” said Rep. Ayanna Pressley, D-Mass., in a statement roughly one year ago. “Broad-based student debt cancellation is precisely the kind of bold, high-impact policy that the broad and diverse coalition that elected Joe Biden and Kamala Harris expect them to deliver.”

There are two ways to cancel student loans

To understand why Biden hasn’t pushed for broad student loan forgiveness, it helps to understand how he could, using one of two doors: 1) Congress or 2) executive action.

Door No. 1 is less controversial, to be sure, but keying it open requires bipartisan support or, at least, unwavering support from Democrats. Loan cancellation appears to have neither.

Consider this: Among the proposals that have been dropped from Biden’s Build Back Better agenda is his pitch for free community college. It’s hard to imagine Democrats would abandon that, at a cost of roughly $45 billion, but still support spending at least $370 billion on student loan forgiveness.

So this door is likely locked — and maybe boarded up from the inside.

That leaves Door No. 2.

Much has been written about the president’s authority — through his education secretary — to simply cancel the debts of millions of borrowers. Here’s an NPR primer from nearly two years ago.

But Biden doesn’t seem eager to try this door. For one thing, he says, it’s not certain that canceling student loans with the stroke of his pen would hold up in court, admitting in a February 2021 town hall that “I don’t think I have the authority” to cancel $50,000 per borrower.

And Biden is not alone in his skepticism.

“The president can’t do it,” said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., speaking to the media in July. “That’s not even a discussion.”

Whether Pelosi’s conclusion was driven by facts or political expediency (read: giving Biden cover for not keeping a campaign promise), Biden has resisted acting unilaterally.

There’s also the matter of cost. Again, forgiving $10,000 per borrower would come with about a $370 billion price tag, according to the Brookings Institution. Forgiving $50,000 per borrower could cost about $1 trillion.

“Why should taxpayers — 70{ac23b82de22bd478cde2a3afa9e55fd5f696f5668b46466ac4c8be2ee1b69550} of whom didn’t go to college — pay back loans for people who have an obligation they haven’t fulfilled?” Foxx asks. (In 2020, the U.S. Census Bureau reported that “From 2010 to 2019, the percentage of people age 25 and older with a bachelor’s degree or higher jumped from 29.9{ac23b82de22bd478cde2a3afa9e55fd5f696f5668b46466ac4c8be2ee1b69550} to 36.0{ac23b82de22bd478cde2a3afa9e55fd5f696f5668b46466ac4c8be2ee1b69550}.”)

Foxx thinks this popularity question is a big reason behind Biden’s hesitancy to act.

“I do think the president maybe understands that broad loan forgiveness is not popular in this country, which is why, I think, he has not gone the route of doing what some in his party want to do.”

But polling suggests broad loan forgiveness would be popular, if done with some nuance. For example, a Grinnell College poll conducted in March found that 27{ac23b82de22bd478cde2a3afa9e55fd5f696f5668b46466ac4c8be2ee1b69550} of respondents supported forgiving all student debt and an additional 39{ac23b82de22bd478cde2a3afa9e55fd5f696f5668b46466ac4c8be2ee1b69550} supported forgiveness “for those in need.” In other polling — from Vox/Data for Progress and the Harris Poll — a majority of respondents supported broad, if limited, forgiveness.

Instead of acting unilaterally, though, this year Biden asked the Education and Justice departments to explore his legal options. The results are still TBD, more than six months later.

Since then, the White House has gone largely quiet on loan cancellation. Some advocates — and many Democrats — worry that, for whatever reason, the administration is intentionally dragging its feet. Not so, said Kvaal, the education undersecretary, in his interview with NPR.

“Legal authority is not an on-off switch. You need to think about the standards that would be applied, the rationale that we can muster,” Kvaal explained. “We are looking very carefully with the White House and the Department of Justice at whether we can cancel loans across the board for everyone, and that’s something where deliberations are still continuing.”

Time may be running out

There’s an argument to be made that Biden is running out of time to broadly cancel student debts. Democrats’ majorities in Congress are likely to shrink next year, if not melt into minorities.

What’s more, the Education Department has said it will require that federal student loan payments, paused during the pandemic, resume as early as Jan. 31.

Imagine millions of borrowers navigating a repayment system they haven’t used in more than a year and a half. Many will need to speak with their loan servicing company to change repayment options. And two of those companies, which serve roughly 15 million borrowers, are right now transitioning out of the federal student loan business all together.

NPR has spoken with more than a dozen student loan experts, including a handful inside the department, who all say they expect this return to repayment to be … difficult.

If broad-based student loan forgiveness is going to happen, it makes all the sense in the world to do it before Jan. 31. Biden’s campaign pledge would mean millions of borrowers would have their debts erased, allowing them to avoid this difficult, potentially disastrous payment restart.

That doesn’t mean Biden has to keep his $10,000 loan forgiveness pledge by then. It just means, if he doesn’t, it’s hard to imagine broad forgiveness happening anytime soon, if at all.